Section 215 Emissions Pricing Report Shows Progress

17 January 2023

A section 215 report, released by the Government shortly before Christmas, outlines several changes to the proposed emissions pricing system that give greater certainty for farmers, and better recognises on-farm sequestration.


According to Beef + Lamb New Zealand (B+LNZ), “The Section 215 agricultural emissions pricing report and accompanying commentary released by the Government today is a step forward, but there is still significant work to be done on critical details before sheep and beef farmers can feel confident in the final agricultural emissions pricing system.”


It confirms that the Government has agreed to a farm-level split gas levy rather than agriculture entering the NZ Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).


Then Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern said, “The most important thing is getting an emission reduction system set up that lasts. We are working hard alongside the agriculture sector to strike the balance between building good levels of sector buy in, while also ensuring the system is robust and meets our emissions reductions goals. With or without the Government’s proposals the world is changing and New Zealand needs to be at the front of the queue to stay competitive in a market that is increasingly demanding sustainably produced products.”


B+LNZ chief executive Sam McIvor says the report is a significant improvement on what the Government proposed in October and follows the He Waka Eke Noa partners’ consultation submission (see the earlier article on Climate Change in the Beef & Lamb February 2022 newsletter which discusses He Waka Eke Noa) and ongoing work to address a range of issues. “The Government has committed to designing a system that is practical to implement while ensuring that a viable and productive agricultural sector continues – we’ll hold them to account on that.”, says Sam McIvor and adds, “In this regard the Government has committed that methane and nitrous oxide prices should be as low as possible and be fixed for a five-year period to provide certainty. Given that New Zealand is the first country in the world to price agricultural emissions, it’s essential a cautious approach is taken and that we ensure what farmers are asked to do is fair and equitable, doesn’t threaten farm viability or result in emissions leakage.”


The sector will be given greater input into pricing decisions and widen the criteria of factors to be considered to include social, cultural and economic impacts. Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor has said, however, that oversight of this levy setting system will rest with the Climate Change Commission, but that they are establishing a board with representatives from the agriculture sector and Māori to provide advice and act as an avenue for sector input. B+LNZ disagrees with the proposal that the Climate Change Commission advice should have priority: “The Government has recognised the disproportionate impact on sheep beef and deer farmers of its earlier proposal and committed to ensure that the impacts are equitable across sectors – we’re working with them on potential provisions to ensure sheep and beef farmers do not face an unfair burden of emissions management. The viability of sheep and beef farming cannot be threatened through this pricing scheme.”


Sequestration remains a key area of focus for B+LNZ. It believes that, though the report commits in principle, to recognising all categories of sequestration and transitioning to the ETS, there is more clarity required on this.


B+LNZ’s message is consistent on this – if farmers are to pay for their emissions, they must be recognised for their sequestration at a fair value and it needs to be from 2025.


Sam McIvor also notes B+LNZ is heartened that the Government has acknowledged and committed to act on two issues that B+LNZ has long advocated for. 


The first is the consideration of different ways to track warming impacts, such as global warming potential, on the related issue of emissions reduction targets.


The second is noting the impact of offsetting rules within the ETS on sheep and beef farming and rural communities, and the admission of the need for urgent efforts. McIvor asserts that “We won’t stop pushing for them to turn concern into action.”


McIvor says the Government has listened to feedback to date. “I want to acknowledge the willingness of Ministers and officials to make changes, and their commitment to work with He Waka Eke Noa partners including B+LNZ to find the right solutions. We now need to nail down the detail to ensure equity, fairness and a viable pathway for our sheep and beef farmers.”


Final decisions on agricultural emissions pricing will be made by Cabinet in early 2023 with the aim to introduce legislation by the middle of the year.

Tax planning helps you do more with your money
8 July 2026
Tax may be boring, but smart use of tax planning is a superb way to help your business do more with your money.
Is your business structure still the right fit?
3 July 2026
Your business structure plays an important role in how your business operates, how profits are taxed, how decisions are made, and how much personal risk you may be exposed to. For many businesses, the structure chosen at the start made sense at the time. But as your business grows or changes, it is worth asking whether that structure still supports where you are now - and where you are heading. The three most common business structures are sole trader, partnership and company. Each has different cost, administration, tax and liability considerations. Operating as a sole trader A sole trader structure is where one person owns and runs the business. The main benefit is simplicity. It is easy to set up, and from a tax perspective, business profits or losses are included in your personal tax return. Being a sole trader also does not prevent you from employing staff if your business grows. However, this structure can carry more personal risk. Sole traders generally have unlimited liability, which means if the business runs into financial or legal trouble, you may be personally liable. This makes the right insurance and risk management especially important. A sole trader structure can also become limiting if you want to bring in other owners, attract investment, or prepare the business for sale. Working within a partnership A partnership is where two or more people go into business together. Partnerships can be a practical way to combine skills, knowledge, resources and capital. They are usually relatively simple to set up and manage, although it is important to have a clear partnership agreement in place. This should document how profits are shared, how decisions are made, and what happens if one partner wants to leave or circumstances change. From a tax perspective, partnership profits are generally not taxed at the partnership level. Instead, each partner includes their share of the profits in their own personal tax return. The main risk is that partnerships do not offer the same legal separation as a company. In many cases, partners may be liable for partnership debts jointly and severally. There are ways to reduce this risk, such as using a limited partnership, but this should be considered carefully with the right professional advice. Operating as a company A company is a separate legal entity from its owners, who are known as shareholders. One of the key advantages of a company structure is limited liability. In many cases, a shareholder’s financial liability is limited to the amount they have invested in the business. A company structure can also be useful if you want to bring in investors, introduce new shareholders, or sell the business in future. However, companies usually come with higher administration and compliance requirements than a sole trader or simple partnership structure. This includes annual accounts, tax returns, Companies Office requirements and other record-keeping obligations. It is also important to remember that company funds belong to the company, not personally to the directors or shareholders. Money is usually taken out through salary, dividends, drawings or director loan accounts, depending on the circumstances. Getting this right is important from both a tax and cashflow perspective. When should you review your structure? It may be worth reviewing your business structure if: your business has grown or become more complex you have taken on staff, debt, assets or higher levels of risk you are considering bringing in another owner or investor you are planning to sell, exit or pass on the business your personal circumstances have changed you are unsure whether your current structure is still tax-effective or appropriate Is your current structure still working for you? There is no one-size-fits-all answer when it comes to business structure. The right option depends on your business, your goals, your risk profile and your future plans. If you are unsure whether your current structure is still the best fit, talk to our team. We can help you understand the pros and cons of each option and work with your legal adviser where needed to make sure your structure supports your business now and into the future.
Getting the balance right with AI: Some dos and don'ts
29 June 2026
We’re experiencing an ‘AI revolution’. But do you know where AI can truly benefit your small business? We cover some key dos and don’ts of using AI in your business.
SHOW MORE

To discuss all your account matters please call us on 09 438 1001

Green button with white arrow and text: Log in to our client portal.